Declarant, Kenneth Wayne, states that he is competent to be a witness, and that the facts stated hereinbelow are true and correct to the best of Declarant’s first hand knowledge and belief under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the state of Washington.

Declarant Signature   Date 3-27-02

Declarant, David Carroll, Stephenson, states that he is competent to be a witness, and that the facts stated hereinbelow are true and correct to the best of Declarant’s first hand knowledge and belief under penalty of perjury pursuant to the law of the state of Washington.

Declarant Signature   Date 3-27-02

1. The district court has venue jurisdiction pursuant to law as the acts complained of occurred, in substantial part, in the western district of Washington and the primary place of business of the primary defendant(s) is located in the western district of Washington codified at 28 USC 128(b), 28 USC 132; 28 USC 1391;

2. The district court has subject matter jurisdiction of the claims for remedy or relief as each claim raises a federal question pursuant to law as codified at 28 USC 1331;

3. The district court has subject matter jurisdiction of the claims for declaratory remedy or relief pursuant to law as codified at 28 USC 2201, et seq.;

4. The district court has subject matter jurisdiction of the claims for injunctive remedy or relief pursuant to law as codified at 28 USC 1651;

5. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity as Executive Trustee of Consular & Diplomatic Transport Services and subject to an express contract to prosecute the interest(s) of the principal (herein CDTS) an express trust established by contract (non-statutory corporation), Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity as Managing Director of The Advocate & Associates an express trust organization established by contract, The Advocate & Associates being Chairman of the Board of Directors of Consular & Diplomatic Transport Services an express trust established by contract, and as such is a person(s) guaranteed due process of law and equal protcction of the law as if it were one of the sovereign people of the state of Washington as guaranteed at Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, the authority of the trustee(s) to bring the complaint on behalf of the express trust is recognized at FRCP 17(a). Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson as expressly contracted to prosecute the interests of the Board of Trustees of Consular & Diplomatic Transport Services bring claims for acts upon Consular & Diplomatic Transport Services by defendants within the western district of the state of Washington one of the several members of the union of the several states as the United States of America at all times herein alleged.

6. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne (Herein “Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne”) is one of the sovereign living people of the state of Washington as recognized at WSL 1975 1st ex.s. c 294 § 1; 1973 c 1 § 1 [RCW 42.17.O1O]. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne was domiciled at the state of Washington, one of the several members of the union of the United States of America at all times herein alleged. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne is entitled to equal protection of the law as if he were a citizen of the United States of America, the republic established AD 1787-1791 as is binding upon and within the state of Washington and upon any political or corporate subdivisions of the state of Washington by operation of the equal protection and due process clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution.

DEFENDANTS:

7. EACH OF THE NATURAL PERSONS NAMED AS DEFENDANTS ARE ALLEGED TO HAVE ACTED OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE OFFICE(S) WHICH THEY ALSO HOLD AND IN BREACH OF THE OATH OF OFFICE CONTRACT EACH EXECUTED BEFORE ENTERING UPON THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE(S) HELD.

8. The privately sued natural person defendants named in this action are alleged to be proper parties in their private capacities, NOT their Official Capacity(s). The defendants are alleged to have acted under color of state law and without lawful authority at all times herein alleged. Each of the natural person defendants is alleged to have acted as a matter of pattern and practice contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States. Each of the natural person defendants is alleged to have participated in, and/or ratified and condoned the corruption of the offices of the political and/or corporate enterprises which they hold, and to have received consideration, profit, gain and enrichment for themselves and the enterprises as a result of the corruption of the offices they each also hold.

9. The supreme court whose process runs in the name “State of Washington” (WSL Dec. 23, 1889) is sued as a Washington legislature organized corporate enterprise, and including its agencies and subdivisions (Pierce County, etc.), herein “State of Washington”) alleged by the Plaintiffs to have been corrupted by the individual defendants for the profit, gain, and enrichment of the individuals and the enterprise, and as a subdivision under the state of Washington which has an extraordinary duty to prevent, or aid in the prevention of, constitutional violations and has refused or neglected to do so.

10. The Washington State Bar Association is sued as an enterprise organized by the association of those several persons who are “admitted to practice” before the corporate supreme court whose process runs in the name “State of Washington” (Dec. 23 1889) alleged by the Plaintiff’s to have been corrupted by the named individual members and the associated member defendants for the profit, gain, and enrichment of the named individual members, the associated members, and the enterprise;

11. The several individual members of the Washington State Bar Association are sued in association under their common name as individuals who have corrupted, or ratified and condoned the corruption of, and/or have refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevention or correction of, the corruption of the Washington State Bar Association, the supreme court whose process runs in the name “State of Washington”, and the general government of the state of Washington, and who each individually partake of the profit, gain, and enrichment afforded those who corrupt, or fail to prevent the corruption of the enterprises for the profit, gain, and enrichment of those individuals and the enterprises contrary to the Oath of Office contract each is a subject of incorporating the United States Constitution and the constitution and laws of the state of Washington.

12. Plaintiffs jointly request the court for declaratory relief that the protections of the Bill of Rights (Articles I — X in Amendment) are binding within the state of Washington by operation the equal protection clause of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution the supremacy clause of Article VI of the federal constitution, and/or the supremacy recognition clause of the Washington constitution, and upon all officers the state by operation of Article VI § 3 of the federal consitution.

13. Plaintiffs jointly request the court for declaratory judgment that the individuals nmned who hold office under the state of Washington and its subdivisions, including but not limited to “State of Washington” and its subdivisions:
a. Are individually subject to the Oath of Office as required at Article VI, Clause 3, of the federal constitution
b. And as such indivdually liab1e for damages or injuries occurring as a result of any act breach of the requisite Oath contract;
c. The Oath being required BEFORE entering upon the duties of the office held, breach of the requisite Oath is an act outside the scope of the office held;
d. For which there is no official immunity or indemnification available from the principal State granting the power of the office.
14. Plaintiffs jointly request the court for declaratory judgment that the “criminal process’ brought against Kenneth Wayne is VOID AB INITIO for:
a. lack of jurisdiction; and,
b. lack of counsel;
c. lack of due process; and,
d. lack of equal protection of law;

15. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity requests the court declare that CDTS’ constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights as guaranteed within the state of Washington by operation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution were violated by the acts contrary to law, and failures to act required by law, by the Defendants as alleged herein;
16. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity requests the court enjoin the defendants from acting on any process created in violation of CDTS’ constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights as alleged herein;
17. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity requests the court RESERVED;

18. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity requests the court grant such other remedy and/or relief as may be just and/or proper.

19. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne requests the court declare that his constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights protected within the state of Washington by operation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution were violated by the acts contrary to law, and failures to act required by law, of the Defendants as alleged herein;

20. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne requests the court enjoin the defendants from acting on any process created in violation of his constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights as alleged herein;

21. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne requests RESERVED;

22. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne requests the court grant such other remedy and/or relief as may be just and/or proper.

DEFINITIONS

23. The terms “this State”, “State of Washington”, and “supreme court” means the body organized by the Washington legislature by the act of December 23, 1889 organizing a Supreme court.

24. The term “state of Washington” means the body of the sovereign people who organized a general government, and their general government, as admitted to the union of the several united States of America by act of Congress and recognized by the President by proclamation in 1889 AD, and their successors in interest to the sovereignty of the people, and the general government thereby established.

Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Canacity STATES and CLAIMS:

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies:

25. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims that Plaintiffs principal has presented its claims to the Office of Risk Management, the state agency responsible for administering claims against the state of Washington, state agencies and state actors [RCW 4.92];

26. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims the Office of Risk Management, as agent of “State of Washington” is subject to the common law as modified by statute, and specifically is subject to the Washington Administrative Procedures Act [Codified at RCW 34.05].

27. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims that the records of the Office of Risk management show that the Office of Risk Management failed to respond to CDTS’ claims;

Allegations of FACT and CLAIMS;

28. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity states and alleges that each natural person Defendant is subject to an Oath of Office contract as a state executive or judicial officer as provided at Article VI of the federal constitution;

29. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity states and alleges that each natural person Defendant is required to be subject to an Oath contract as provided at Article VI of the federal constitution BEFORE entering upon the duties of the executive or judicial office each natural person Defendant holds;

30. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity states and alleges that each Defendant who has breached his/her Oath contract required by Article VI of the federal constitution before entering upon the duties of the executive or judicial office held cannot assert, or have asserted on his/her behalf, any official immunity for constitutional violations in breach of the Oath contract which was executed BEFORE entering on any official duties;

31. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity states and alleges that the commission of a crime may never be defended upon a claim of official immunity as the officers principal cannot lawfully authorize or order criminal activity as a duty of any office thereunder;

32. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims that about April, 1999 COTS purchased a 1993 Ford Aerostar van, and was required by the seller, a licensed agent of “State of Washington” located at or about 12705 Pacific Avenue S., Pierce county, Washington, to execute documents for application to “State of Washington” through its Department of Licensing, for title, license, and registration process.

33. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims, and the uncontroverted administrative record affirms, that Defendant Fred Stephens, at the Department of Licensing, Olympia, Washington, in or about April, 1999, received administrative process with, and subsequently by mail regarding, the application for title and registration (licensing) regarding the CDTS’ Ford van reserving rights and displaying markings indicating that the process was subject to the qualification of “without prejudice” and “without recourse”, and failed to respond in any mamer to CDTS’ administrative process;

34. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims, and the administrative record affirms, that Defendant Fred Stephens, at Olympia, Washington, during or about April and May, 1999, failed to initiate any administrative process to controvert, or otherwise object to, the claims and reservations made in CDTS’ administrative process regarding CDTS’ Ford van invoking and exercising the right of Defendant Fred Stephens, and his Principal “State of Washington”, to accept the administrative notice informally as a final administrative agreement as provided in the Washington Administrative Procedures Act [RCW 34.05].

35. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims, and the administrative record, and “State of Washington” official records show that, Defendant Meenan, using official “State of Washington” signaling devices, stopped and contacted CDTS Ford van and its occupant, Kenneth Wayne an officer of CDTS, on May 27, 2000.

36. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims that Defendant Meenan, on or about May 27, 2000 and immediately subsequent to the stopping of the Ford van, was presented evidence, a certified copy of the “State of Washington” registration documents evidencing that the license and registration for CDTS’ Ford van were negotiated “w/o prejudice” and “w/o recourse” and had actual NOTICE and knowledge thereof.

37. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims that Defendant Defendants DePretto and Kerwin, were each provided, by Defendant Meenan, NOTICE of the evidence, a copy of the “State of Washington” registration documents evidencing that the license and registration for CDTS' Ford van were negotiated “w/o prejudice” and “w/o recourse”, and had actual NOTICE and KNOWLEDGE thereof.

38. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims that Defendants Meenan, DePretto, and Kerwin having actual NOTICE and KNOWLEDGE that the license and registration for CDTS’ Ford van were negotiated "w/o prejudice":
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as at executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. At or about the 17000 block of Pacific Avenue South, Pierce county, Washington;
c. Without any prior judicial process (with prejudice):
d. KNOWINGLY and INTENTIONALLY contrary to the terms and conditions of the negotiated license and registration agreement accepted by their principal “State of Washington”, in impairment of the contract between CDTS and its officer Kenneth Wayne for the operation of the CDTS’ Ford van, and without lawful authority, seized the CDTS’ Ford van, and its occupant Kenneth Wayne, an officer of CDTS acting in his official capacity pursuant to contract, and directly contrary to the negotiated and uncontroverted administrative record that the license authority of “State of Washington” and thus any officer or agent thereof was "w/o (without) prejudice";
e. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDTS incurring damages and/or injuries, having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

39. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims that Defendants Meenan, DePretto, and Kerwin having actual NOTICE and KNOWLEDGE that the license and registration for CDTS’ Ford van were negotiated "w/o recourse":
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article 1 § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. At or about the 17000 block of Pacific Avenue South, Pierce county, Washington;
c. Without any lawful authority;
d. Knowingly and intentionally contrrny to the negotiated license and registration agreement, accepted by their principal “State of Washington”, initiated a recourse action by the seinire of the CDTS’ Ford van and its occupant, Kenneth Wayne, an officer of CDTS acting in his official capacity, directly contrary to the negotiated and uncontroverted administrative record that the license authority of “State of Washington” and thus any officer or agent thereof, was "w/o without) recourse"
e. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDI’S incurring damages and/or injuries, having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

40. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity alleges and claims tat Defendants Meenan, Depretto, and Kerwin, without a warrant, without permission of the owner, and without lawful authority, seized numerous items of private property, including but not limited to cash, checks, securities, private records, privately issued credentials, and arms, owned or held in trust by CDTS from the CDTS’ Ford van, and continue to seize those items to date, most of the items seized appear on the inventory form, (approximately $450.00 in Federal Reserve Notes is not listed on the inventory form)
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, axwi the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. At or about the 17000 block of Pacific Avenue South, Pierce county, Washington;
c. Without any prior judicial process (with prejudice);
d. Seized the CDTS’ Ford van and its occupant, Kenneth Wayne, an officer of CDTS acting in his official capacity, directly contrary to the negotiated and uncontroverted administrative record that the license authority of “State of Washington” and thus any officer or agent thereof is subject to, “w/o (without) prejudice”.
e. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDTS incurring damages and/or injuries, having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

41. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XLV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract he is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendant Depretto;
c. On or about June 5, 2000,
d. At or about the 18600 block of Pacific Avenue S., Pierce county, Washington;
e. While having prior actual KNOWLEDGE and NOTICE that the license and registration for the CDTS Ford van is negotiated and agreed by his Principal “State of Washington” through the Director of its Department of Licensing, Defendant Stephens, to be without prejudice and without recourse;
f. Initiated a prejudicial recourse action by activating official “State of Washington” signaling devices causing the prejudicial seizure of CDTS Ford van, and the CDTS officer, Kenneth Wayne, who was acting in his official capacity pursuant to contract relating to the operation of the CDTS’ Ford van;
g. Resulting in the initiation of recourse proceedings against the CDTS’ Ford van, and against the GETS officer, Kenneth Wayne, who was carrying out the operation of the CDTS’ Ford van as an official act pursuant to private contract;
h. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDTS incurring damages and/or injuries having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

42. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract he is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendant Depretto;
c. On or about June 5, 2000;
d. At or about the 18600 block of Pacific Avenue S., Pierce county, Washington;
e. While having prior actual KNOWLEDGE and NOTICE that the license and registration for the CDTS Ford van is negotiated and agreed by his Principal “State of Washington” through the Director of its Department of Licensing, Defendant Stephens, to be without prejudice and without recourse;
f Initiated a prejudicial recourse action by seizing and taking CDTS’ Ford van;
g. Resulting in the pre-judicial taking of CDTS’ property (funds) without due process of law and without just compensation for the recovery of CDTS’ Ford van;
h. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDTS incurring damages and/or injuries, having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wavi~e in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

43. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as a (quasi) judicial/executive officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendant Ladenburg, acting in concert or conspiracy with, and as principal through the acts of Defendant Kooiman;
c. On or about June 15, 2000, and thereafter;
d. At the Pierce County District Court, located at Tacoma, Pierce county, Washington;
e. While having prior actual KNOWLEDGE and NOTICE that the license and registration for the CDTS Ford van is negotiated and agreed by his Principal “State of Washington” through the Director of its Department of Licensing, Defendant Stephens, to be “without prejudice” and “without recourse”;
f. Prosecuted a recourse action by prosecuting process against the CDTS’ officer, Kenneth Wayne, relating to his carrying out official duties as a matter of contract relating to the operation of CDTS’ Ford van;
g. Impairing the obligations of the contract between CDTS and its officer, Kenneth Wayne;
h. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CUPS incurring damages and/or injuries, having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

44. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as a judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendant Culpepper;
c. On or about June 15, 2000, and thereafter;
d. At the Pierce County District Court operated at Tacoma, Pierce county, Washington;
e. While subject to a conflict of interest as an officer of the Plaintiff “admitted to practice” in its name and under its authority, and while an agent of the Plaintiff in the action by membership in its agency Washington State Bar Association;
f. Having been presented, by filing into the record and notice in open court, actual KNOWLEDGE and NOTICE that CDTS made NOTICE OF APPEARANCE and intervened and indemnified its officer, Kenneth Wayne;
g. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard for the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rigbts of CDTS and its officer, denied CDTS access to the court, impairing the duties of CDTS contract with its officer, Kenneth Wayne, to intervene and indemnify said officer for official duties;
h. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard of the constitutionally guaranteed due process rights of CDTS and its officer participated in and perpetuated without jurisdiction, and having the authority and power to do so, refused to prevent or correct the ongoing prosecution of a recourse action contrary to the terms of the license contract between “State of Washington” and CDTS regarding CDTS’ Ford van;
i. Resulting in the unconstitutional impairment of the contract between CDTS and its officer;
j. Unconstitutionally impairing the license contract between CDTS and “State of Washington” as negotiated “without recourse”;
k. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDTS incurring damages and/or injuries, having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

45. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as a judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Strombom and Van Doornink;
c. On or about April 25, 2001, and thereafter;
d. At the Pierce County Superior Court operated at Tacoma, Pierce county, Washington;
e. While appearing to suffer the disability of a conflict of interest, bias, and partiality as an officer and agent of the Plaintiff supreme court (WSL Dec. 23, 1889) dba “State of Washington”, through its agency Washington State Bar Association, under whose process CDTS alleges its rights are violated and from which it seeks redress;
f Having been presented an action under cause number 01-2-07539-5 in the nature of an application for writ of mandamus to protect the due process rights of CDTS;
g. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard for the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS and its officer, denied CDTS and its officers access to the court to petition for redress of grievances by joining CDTS’ extraordinary remedy action with another action for appeal and obstructing CDTS individual constitutionally guaranteed right to Petition for redress in a matter in which it was denied any remedy in the ordinary course of law (intervention in the action against its officer);
h. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard of the constitutionally guaranteed due process and petition for redress rights of CDTS willfully failed, in knowing and intentional breach of the Oath contract required by Article VI of the federal constitution, to perform the ministerial duty to issue an extraordinary writ upon application for which the parties to the action could have a constitutionally guaranteed due process hearing;
i. Resulting in the unconstitutional impairment of the contract between CDTS and its officer, unconstitutionally denying the parties a due process hearing on the merits of CDTS’ claims, and unconstitutionally infringing upon CDTS’ right to petition for redress of grievances;
j. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDTS continuing to incur damages and/or injuries, have its contracts impaired, and perpetuating a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

46. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execMte before entering upon duties as an executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Meenan, DePretto, and Kerwin;
c. On or about October 19, 2000, and thereafter;
d. At or about 13500 Pacific Ave. S at Pierce county, Washington;
e. Having actual KNOWLEDGE and NOTICE that CDTS had reserved rights “without prejudice” and “without recourse”;
f. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard for the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS and its officer, initiated a prejudicial recourse action by seizing the CDTS Ford van and arresting and bringing process against CDTS officer, Kenneth Wayne, carrying out his official duties under contract;
g. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard of the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS and its officer impaired the contracts between CDI’S and its officer, Kenneth Wayne;
h. Resulting in the unconstitutional impairment of the contract between CUTS and its officer;
i. Unconstitutionally impairing the license contract between CDTS and “State of Washington” as negotiated “without recourse”;
j. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDI’S incurring damages and/or injuries, having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

47. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, mid V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contact each is required to execute before entering upon duties as a judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Jasprika and Heller;
c. On or about October 20, 2000, and thereafter;
d. At the Pierce County District Court #1, at Tacoma, Pierce county, Washington;
e. While subject to a conflict of interest as an officer of the Plaintiff “admitted to practice” in its name and under its authority, and while an agent of the Plaintiff in the action by membersbip in its agency Washington State Bar Association;
f. Having actual NOTICE and KNOWLEDGE that the CDTS officer, Kenneth Wayne, had questioned the nature and cause of the action, and the jurisdiction of the Pierce County District Court regarding the matter;
g. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard for the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS and its officer, perpetuated process against CDTS officer, failed to compel disclosure of the nature and cause of the action, and without power of attorney or other delegation of authority from CDTS or its officer entered a “plea” of “not guilty’ making and allowing to stand the false appearance of understanding of the nature and cause and agreement to join issue;
h. Knowingy. intentionally, and with willful disregard of the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS and its officer unpaired the contracts between CDTS and its officer, Kenneth Wayne for CDTS to intervene and indemnify its officer by refusing CDTS access to the court;
i. Resulting in an unconstitutional denial of due process and equal protection of the law;
j. Resulting in the unconstitutional impairment of the contract between CDTS and its officer;
k. Unconstitutionally impairing the license contact between CUTS and “State of Washington” as negotiated “without recourse”;
l. Resulting directly and/or proximately in CDTS incurring damages and/or injuries having its contracts impaired, and a taking of its property without due process of law and without just compensation for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity are entitled to a remedy for their principal.

48. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his individual capacity states and alleges, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “state of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive or judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Meenan, DePretto, and Kerwin;
c. On or about May 27, 2000;
d. At or about the 17000 block of Pacific Avenue South, Pierce county, Washington;
e. Having actual Notice and Knowledge that the license and registration of the CDTS Ford van whose operation said defendants were investigating was negotiated “without prejudice” and “without recourse”;
f. Without any injured party, without any damage or injury, and without evidence of intent to cause any party injury or damage;
g. Without any unqualified agreement, contract, or license to do so;
h. While armed, and with the use of actual physical force;
i. Under color of State law;
j. Seized Kenneth Wayne, transported Kenneth Wayne to another location where Kenneth Wayne was concealed under a fictitious name and inventory control number, and held Kenneth Wayne upon a demand of payment of at least $10,000.00 for release;
k. Resulting in Kenneth Wayne having his contract with CDTS impaired, and was injured in loss of liberty, injured in loss of time and productivity, and injured in loss of property, for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne is entitled to a remedy as an operation of law.

49. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his individual capacity states and alleges, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) II, IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive or judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Meenan, DePretto, and Kerwin;
c. On or about May 27, 2000;
d. At or about the 17000 block of Pacific Avenue South, Pierce county, Washington;
e. Having actual Notice and knowledge that the license and registration of the CDTS Ford van had been negotiated “without prejudice” and “without recourse”;
f. Having Notice that they did not have any agreement, contract, or license to do so;
g. While armed, and having used actual physical force;
h. Searched the CDTS Ford van under color of State law without a warrant and under unwarrantable instances;
i. Seized private property under color of State law without a warrant and under unwarrantable circumstances;
j. Without any evidence that the Colt pistol seized was a “firearm” and not an arm, for which the federal constitution provides that Kenneth Wayne, as one of the people, has a constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear;
k. Resulting in Kenneth Wayne having his contract with CDTS impaired, and was injured in loss of liberty, injured in loss of time and productivity, and injured in loss of property, for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne is entitled to a remedy as an operation of law.

50. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “state of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract he is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendant Depretto;
c. On or about June 5, 2000;
d. At or about the 18600 block of Pacific Avenue S., Pierce county, Washington;
e. While having prior actual KNOWLEDGE and NOTICE that the license and registration for the CDTS Ford van is negotiated and agreed by his Principal “State of Washington” through the Director of its Department of Licensing, Defendant Stephens, to be without prejudice and without recourse;
f. Initiated a prejudicial recourse action by seizing Kenneth Wayne using actual physical force and while armed;
g. Issued pre-judlicial process to Kenneth Wayne as a recourse action for alleged wrongs relating to the operation of CDTS’ Ford van:
h. Resulting in a breach of the negotiated license conditions under which CDTS’ Pord van was operated;
i. Resulting directly and/or proximately in Kenneth Wayne incurring damages and/or injuries, having his contracts impaired for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne is entitled to a remedy as an operation of law.

51. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his individual capacity states and alleges, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) II, IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive or judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Ladenburg, Kooiman, and Culpepper;
c. On or about June 15, 2000, and thereafter;
d. Under color of State law, and without authority of law;
e. At the Pierce County District Court #1, an enterprise operated under the appearance of process of the body organized by the Washington legislature December 23, 1889 whose process shall run in the name “State of Washington”, located at Tacoma, Fierce county, Washington;
f. When having actual Notice and Knowledge that the license and registration agreements of the CDTS’ Ford van were negotiated without prejudice and without recourse;
g. Prosecuted and allowed to be prosecuted a recourse action against Kenneth Wayne for carrying out the duties required by contract for the operation of CDTS’ Ford van, which was negotiated without prejudice and without recourse;
h. Acted in concert or conspiracy to deny Kenneth Wayne’s principal CDTS access to the court to prosecute its claim of right to intervene and indemnify its contracted officer, Kenneth Wayne, impairing the obligations of the contract between Kenneth Wayne and CDTS;
i. Acted in concert or conspiracy to deprive Kenneth Wayne of counsel in prohibiting Kenneth Wayne from having any counsel who was not first an officer and agent of the Plaintiff;
j. Acted in concert or conspiracy to deprive Kenneth Wayne of the due process of an impartial judicial officer who is not first an officer and agent of the Plaintiff;
k. Carried out the pattern and practice of retaliatory imprisonment for the attempted exercise of due process rights as taught by Defendant Loginsky in the series of three “training manuals” entitled “FREEMEN, ARMAGEDDON’S PROPHETS OF HATE AND TERROR”, extorting Kenneth Wayne’s rights protected by the federal constitution to due process of law, equal protection of law, counsel, and petition for redress of grievances;
l. Resulting in the unconstitutional prosecution, confinement, conviction, publication of derogatory records of conviction (infamy) and deprivation of property and liberty under color of State law for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne is entitled to a remedy as an operation of law.

52. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne states and alleges, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as an executive (police) officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Meenan, DePretto, and Kerwin;
c. On or about October 19, 2000, and thereafter;
d. At or about 13500 Pacific Ave. S at Pierce county, Washington;
e. Having actual KNOWLEDGE and NOTICE that CDTS had reserved rights “without prejudice” and “without recourse”;
f. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard for the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS and its officer, initiated a prejudicial recourse action by seizing the CDTS Ford van and arresting and bringing process against CDTS’ officer, Kenneth Wayne, carrying out his official duties under contract;
g. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard of the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS and its officer impaired the contracts between CDTS and its officer, Kenneth Wayne;
h. Resulting in the unconstitutional impairment of the contract between CDTS and its officer;
i. Resulting directly and/or proximately in Kenneth Wayne incurring damages and/or injuries, having his contracts impaired, and a taking of his property and liberty without due process of law for which Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his private capacity is entitled to a remedy as an operation of law;

53. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Private Capacity states and alleges, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as a judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Jasprika and Heller;
c. On or about October 20, 2000, and thereafter;
d. At the Pierce County District Court #1, at Tacoma, Pierce county, Washington;
e. While subject to a conifict of interest as an officer of the Plaintiff “admitted to practice” in its name and under its authority, and while an agent of the Plaintiff in the action by membership in its agency Washington State Bar Association;
f. Having actual NOTICE and KNOWLEDGE that the CDTS officer, Kenneth Wayne, had questioned the nature and cause of the action, and the jurisdiction of the Pierce County District Court regarding the matter;
g. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard for the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection rights of CDTS’ officer, Kenneth Wayne, perpetuated process against Kenneth Wayne, failed to compel disclosure of the nature and cause of the action, and without power of attorney or other delegation of authority from Kenneth Wayne entered a “plea” of “not guilty” making and allowing to stand the false appearance of understanding of the nature and cause and agreement to join issue;
h. Knowingly, intentionally, and with willful disregard of the constitutionally guaranteed due process and equal protection fights of CDTS’ officer, Kenneth Wayne, impaired the contracts between CDTS and its officer Kenneth Wayne for CDTS to intervene and indenmify its officer by refusing CDTS access to the court;
i. Resulting in an unconstitutional denial of due process and equal protection of the law;
j. Resulting in the unconstitutional impairment of the contract between CDTS and its officer;
k. Unconstitutionally impairing the license contract between CDTS and “State of Washington” as negotiated “without recourse”;
1. Resulting directly and/or proximately in Kenneth Wayne incurring damages and/or injuries, having his contracts impaired, and a taking of his property and liberty without due process of law Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne is entitled to a remedy as an operation of law.

54. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Private Capacity, and Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity, state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1 of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contract each is required to execute before entering upon duties as a judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Defendants Alexander, Smith, Johnson, Madsen, Ireland, Bridge, Chambers, Owens, Sanders, Locke, Gregoire, Sandberg, Horne, Gorrell, and Stephens;
c. Beginning April, 1999 and continuing trough the present day;
d. Within the state of Washington, a member of the union of the several united State of America;
e. Each having an extraordinary duty pursuant to the Oath contract required by the federal constitution Article VI, to prevent or correct constitutional violations;
f. Refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevention or correction of, the unconstitutional taking of property and liberty from Kenneth Wayne, and CDTS;
g. Ratified and condoned the unconstitutional taking of liberty and property from Kenneth Wayne and CDTS;
h. Refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevention or correction of, the impairment of the negotiated license/registration agreement between the State of Washington and CDTS;
i. Ratified, and condoned the unconstitutional impairment of the negotiated license/registration agreement between the State of Washington and CDTS;
j. Refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevention or correction ot the due process violations of prosecution without disclosure of nature and cause as guaranteed by the federal constitution;
k. Ratified and condoned the due process violations of prosecution without disclosure of nature and cause as guaranteed by the federal constitution;
1. Refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevent,on or correction ot the prosecution of Kenneth Wayne when he was denied the assistance of counsel who did not have a substantial conflict of interest as an officer and agent of the State Court Plaintiff;
m. Ratified and condoned the prosecution of Kenneth Wayne when he was denied the assistance of counsel who did not have a substantial conflict of interest as an officer and agent of the State Court Plaintiff;
n. Refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevention or correction of, the prosecution of Kenneth Wayne when he was denied the due process and equal protection of a judicial officer who did not have a substantial conflict of interest as an officer and agent of the State Court Plaintiff;
o. Ratified and condoned the prosecution of Kenneth Wayne when he was denied the equal protection and due process of a judicial officer who did not have a substantial conflict of interest as an officer and agent of the State Court Plaintiff;
p. Refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevention or correction of, the teaching of due process violations retaliatory imprisonments and prosecutions against persons who attempted to exercise rights protected by the federal constitution of due process, equal protection of law, and petitions for redress of grievances through seminars and other teachings through and with Defendant Loginsky and her training manuals entitled “FREEMEN, ARMAGEDDON’S PROPHETS OF HATE AND TERROR”;
q. Ratified and condoned due process violations, retaliatory imprisonments and prosecutions against persons who attempted to exercise rights protected by the federal constitution of due process, equal protection of law, and petitions for redress of grievances through seminars and other teachings through and with Defendant Loginsky and her training manuals entitled “FREEMEN, ARMAGEDDON’S PROPHETS OF HATE AND TERROR”;
r. Resulting in the deprivation of Plaintiff’s rights under color of State law, and without authority of law, for which Plaintiffs axe entitled to a remedy as an operation of law.

55. Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Private Capacity, and Plaintiff Kenneth Wayne in his Official Capacity and Plaintiff David Carroll, Stephenson in his Official Capacity, state and allege, the administrative record shows, and the official records of “State of Washington” establishes, that:
a. In violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of Article XIV in Amendment to the federal constitution, and the invoked due process rights of Article(s) IV, and V in Amendment to the federal constitution, contrary to Article I § 10 (clause 1) of the federal constitution, and thus in breach of the Oath of Office contact each is required to execute before entering upon duties as a judicial officer subject to the federal constitution;
b. Within the state of Washington, a member of the union of the several united State of America;
c. Defendants CARLISLE, MICHELS, Althoff, and the several members of the Washington State Bar Association as the predecessors and/or successors in interest to the State Bar Act codifled at RCW 2.48, WSL 1933 c 94 § 17 which reads in pertinent part:

“Legislative Intent. The legislature hereby declares that it would have passed this act ... irrespective of the fact that (the act) be declared unconstitutional”.

Each being required as a State officer to have executed the Oath contract required at Article VI of the federal constitution before entering upon the duties of the State office held (Attorney), and having actual or constructive NOTICE of the federal constitutional violations alleged herein, refused or neglected to prevent or correct, or aid in the prevention or correction of the deprivations of rights under color of State law complained of herein~above;
d. Defendants CARLISLE, MICHELS, Althoff, and the several members of the Washington State Bar Association as the predecessors and/or successors in interest to the State Bar Act codified at RCW 2.48, WSL 1933 c 94 § 17 which reads in pertinent part:

“Legislative Intent. The legislature hereby declares that it would have passed this act ... irrespective of the fact that (the act) be declared unconstitutional”.

Each being required as a State officer to have executed the Oath contract required at Article VI of the federal constitution before entering upon the duties of the State office held (Attorney), and having actual or constructive NOTICE of the federal constitutional violations alleged herein-above, ratified and condoned the deprivations of rights under color of law complained of herein-above;

56. Defendant state of Washington, being the body of the people organized in a general government, and its various subdivisions and enterprises, being a party to the federal constitution, has a duty to prevent or correct the federal constitutional violations complained of hereinabove, and instead has refused or neglected to properly train, supervise, and as necessary discipline those persons acting under its authority to prevent the federal constitutional violations complained of herein-above.

WHEREFORE:

Plaintiffs request the court provide the declaratory relief requested above; and upon entry of its declarations,
Plaintiffs request the court provide the injunctive relief requested above; and,
Plaintiffs request the court provide such other relief as it may find appropriate and equitable as an operation of law as may be requested by Plaintiffs as provided in law as codified at 28 USC 2202.

TRIAL BY JURY ON ALL ISSUES IS HEREBY DEMANDED. Given this 27th day of March 2002,

Kenneth Wayne in
contracted capacity,

David Carroll, Stephenson in
contracted capacity,

Kenneth Wayne
individually,